Monday, October 13, 2008

Blog #3


The development of mass media can be attributed to the new mediums of communication. With the advancement of new technologies such as the printing press and telegraph, people were now able to send and receive information across longer distances with greater ease. Therefore information was beginning to be delivered in a more unified way. Newspapers and magazines were created. All of these new mediums are how the idea of mass media came about. However, with new technologies comes some sort of change. In the case of the creation of mass media we witnessed a significant shift toward a consumer society.
Mass Media was important to the introduction of advertising. Advertising came about due to a societal demand for consumer goods. This demand was due in part to the ability of information to reach individuals at a more rapid pace. Therefore people were now completely aware of how others in the world were living. People went from interacting with only a few people each day, to interacting with people outside of their town. Technology was constantly changing, and society was taking an interest. Rosalynn Williams’s discussion of the expositions of the late 19th century is just one example of society’s interest in new technology. At the exposition of 1900 while the idea of technology inspired the exposition, once there people were more interested in the social aspect than the technology. “At the 1900 exposition the sensual pleasure of consumption clearly triumphed over the abstract intellectual enjoyment of contemplating the progress of knowledge” (Williams, 169).
Technology had created a mass media, which in turn gave the public an interest in technology. However, the public was eventually more interested in the advancement of their own wealth and possessions. This shift is clearly seen at the exposition of 1900. People were interested in other people and consumption. This interest began to spark the demand for consumerism in society. The Bon Marche was the first department store and it opened its doors in Paris is 1852 (Williams, 172). “Department stores were organized to inflame these material desires and feelings” (Williams, 172). People were free to browse and were not required to buy (Williams, 172). When the public became more socialized and accustomed to what was going on in the world they began to dream of “things”.
“After 1900, advertisers became more concerned with reaching milling mobs on the run” (Lears, 197). Advertising became an essential part of a consumer society. Without advertising new products and technologies might have never succeeded. Mass Media made this introduction of things to the public possible. The newspapers and magazines could run ads that would reach the public quickly. “The manufacturer correctly sensed that advertising was not about the things themselves, but about the representation of wishes for things” (Lears, 199). The public wished for new things and advertising presented these wishes as not only attainable but necessary. Market research was now increasing important in an advertisers understanding of how and who to market their products to (Lears, 198). But without the introduction of mass media, consumerism and advertising wouldn’t be what they are today.
Looking at advertisements today we are aware of similar presentations of goods. For instance the advertisement above depicts a man sitting on a couch while painting the wall. His body is in an extremely relaxed position and yet he is still painting. Further examining the ad we are aware of a small red van in the bottom left corner. The tagline says “Relax While Working.” I am aware that the advertisement is attempting to sell a Volkswagen Van simply because of my familiarity with the Volkswagen symbol. The ad is selling a van that is hardly the focus of the picture. The red paint and the red on the car are the only immediate connections between the two. If you took away the van and the Volkswagen symbol I am confident that most people would believe the ad was for paint.
However upon carefully examining the advertisement I began to make more connections between what is being shown, and what the ad is hoping to portray. This ad is promising that you will be able to relax while you work if you drive a Volkswagen. The ad is fairly affective as far as communicating the idea of relaxing while working. However, there is no connection made as to how owning this Volkswagen van will help you accomplish what the tagline claims. “Given “an age of faith,” and a lot of money to be made from acquiescent belief, the temptation to lie was overwhelming” (Lears, 201). Lears is suggesting that advertisers were tempted to lie in order to sell a product. While the advertisement that I chose is not an outright lie, there is definitely no connection between the product and the promise.
The advertisers and manufacturers at Volkswagen are hoping to portray the van (which appears to be a work van of sorts) as a comfortable and reliable. They promise that while on the job you will feel relaxed if you drive this van. The advertisers take the focus off of the van and onto the idea that they are trying to sell rather than the product. The advertisers are also playing off of the myth that all of society is lazy. This can also be seen as the American dream for success where relaxation is the entire work one would have to do. Barnes says, “The relation which unites the concept of the myth to its meaning is essentially a relation of deformation.” They have taken the idea of the ad and distorted the truth. “…since myth has in fact a double function: it points out and it notifies, it makes us understand something and it imposes it on us” (Barnes, 1). The myth of this advertisement is that you could actually relax while working. After careful examination of the advertisement I find it slightly more affected then my original observation. However, I still believe that most of the target audience would not be enticed to purchase the van.
Mass Media was essential in the formation of a consumer society. It provided the means for societal interest in consumerism, as well as the means of transporting advertisements to the public. Thus, creating and advertising industry that moulds and shapes the images that we see on a day to day basis. Without Mass Media consumerism in our society would not exist in the form we know it today.
Barnes, Roland. “Myth Today.” Mythologies. 1957. Web. 11 Oct. 2008. http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/barthes/myth_today.html
Lears, Jackson. “Advertising and the Idea of Mass Society.” Communication In History. Fifth edition. Ed David Crowley and Paul Heyer. Pearson Education, Inc, 2007.
Williams, Rosalynd. “Dream World of Consumption.” Communication In History. Fifth edition. Ed David Crowley and Paul Heyer. Pearson Education, Inc, 2007.

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Political Blog #2~

Mark Halperin wrote an article called “Grading the First Presidential Debate” for Time.com. The article was written immediately following Friday’s debate between Presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain. Halperin discusses each individual candidate’s performance and gives both of them a grade. Being that Mark Halperin is “slightly right of center,” I commend his ability to accurately relate the events while remaining neutral.

Halperin discusses John McCain’s inability to show how much he knows about the world (Halperin, p.1). His arguments were all over the place and filled with too many anecdotes. It was painfully obvious that he was nervous and quite possibly unprepared. Halperin says “McCain wavered between respectful and domineering, and ended up awkward and edgy.” Listening to the same sentences repeated over never won anybody a debate. Overall Halperin gives McCain a B- which might even be a little too generous.

In his discussion of Barack Obama he compliments his polished, confident, and fully prepared attitude (Halperin, 2). However he also mentions his failure to get down to the specifics on policy positions. His multiple references to McCain being another Bush were his primary line of attack (Haperin, 2). Although Halperin makes a point to note Obama’s over-prepared often planned responses were a bit obvious. Overall Halperin gives Obama an A- saying, “Standing comfortable on the star with his rival, he showed he belonged."

Personally I was not overly impressed by either candidate. Right from the beginning we were aware of their refusal to debate one another. Both candidates failed to address the current economic crisis in our country today. Their answered were generic and maybe even too rehearsed. When asked about the implications of the bailout plan, and how they planned to compensate for the $700 billion cost, neither candidate had a solution. These issues are currently the most important we are facing as a nation. However, It appeared as though the candidates feared alienation of voters if they took any stance on the subject.

Obama spokeswoman Jen Psaki said, “We are closely monitoring the vote schedule, Senator Obama has always said that when the vote is close and his vote is needed he will be there” (Brown Parnes, 1). This man plans on being President of the United States of America and will only vote if the “vote is close?” I can’t think of a better time then NOW for his vote to be “needed.” McCain’s campaign manager Rick Davis said their candidate, “retains his rights to evaluate it as it goes along and make a final decision” (Brown Parnes, 1). These men are far too concerned with themselves and being elected to get involved. They fear showing their cards to the American people and taking a stance on the issue!

We are supposed to vote for the best candidate, and they won’t even tell us where they stand on the most important issue in our country today? Corey Flintoff said, “Both men agreed that Congress needs to take action, but neither committed to supporting specific parts of the plan.” Jim Lehrer the moderator for the debate was even forced to reward and ask the question twice. Neither candidate wants to take a stance on the economy which leaves me unimpressed. Yes, Barack Obama was eloquent, prepared and a great speaker. And John McCain was a fumbling mess. So what I say. I don’t care who looks nicer, or talks smoother. What I want to know is what these men stand for; and specifics on how it will be accomplished. I’m hoping I won’t be as disappointed in the next debates as I was in the first.

Brown, Carrie and Parnes, Amie. "McCain Obama may skip bailout vote." Politico.com. Capital News Company LLC. 28 Sept. 2008. Web. 30 Sept. 2008. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/14047.html

Flintoff, Corey. "Obama, McCain Face Off Over Spending And War." NPR.org. NPR. 27 Sept. 2008. Web. 1 Oct. 2008. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95128815

Halperin, Mark. "Grading the First Presidential Debat." Time.com. Time Inc. 26 Sept. 2008. Web. 30 Sept. 2008. http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1845106,00.html